Reliability of radiometric dating women profile dating usa

Posted by / 14-Feb-2020 07:41

Reliability of radiometric dating

Yet this view is based on a misunderstanding of how radiometric dating works.

Part 1 (in the previous issue) explained how scientists observe unstable atoms changing into stable atoms in the present.

These basalts yield ages of up to 1 million years based on the amounts of potassium and argon isotopes in the rocks.

To make matters even worse for the claimed reliability of these radiometric dating methods, these same basalts that flowed from the top of the Canyon yield a samarium-neodymium age of about 916 million years,5 and a uranium-lead age of about 2.6 billion years!

No geologist was present when the rocks were formed to see their contents, and no geologist was present to measure how fast the radioactive “clock” has been running through the millions of years that supposedly passed after the rock was formed.

No geologists were present when most rocks formed, so they cannot test whether the original rocks already contained daughter isotopes alongside their parent radioisotopes.

To date a radioactive rock, geologists first measure the “sand grains” in the top glass bowl (the parent radioisotope, such as uranium-238 or potassium-40).

They also measure the sand grains in the bottom bowl (the daughter isotope, such as lead-206 or argon-40, respectively).

reliability of radiometric dating-44reliability of radiometric dating-84reliability of radiometric dating-51

The rate of uranium decay must have been at least 250,000 times faster than today’s measured rate! As this article has illustrated, rocks may have inherited parent and daughter isotopes from their sources, or they may have been contaminated when they moved through other rocks to their current locations.